4 ms·
Not sure how a site can fit in that club? For e.g., if someone uses Google Analytics, that alone comes to 430kb (which most people do)
by namegulf 11mo ago
Not sure how a site can fit in that club?
For e.g., if someone uses Google Analytics, that alone comes to 430kb (which most people do)
- znpy 11mo ago> Not sure how a site can fit in that club? That's the challenge
- namegulf 11mo agotrue
- undeveloper 11mo agoThen don't use google analytics.
- namegulf 11mo agoOne option is to use access logs on the server and process stats
- skydhash 11mo agoIt’s very easy. 512kb can fit a whole novel in epub format. And HTML is a very verbose language.
- namegulf 11mo agoJust sticking with html, it's easy peasy
- 01HNNWZ0MV43FF 11mo agoI've never used it. Some browsers even honor that stupid beacon header now too
- inetknght 11mo ago> For e.g., if someone uses Google Analytics, that alone comes to 430kb (which most people do) Perhaps someone might not use Google Analytics. Perhaps someone might apply 430kb to actual content instead.
- xigoi 11mo agoBack in the early internet, nobody had enough bandwidth to transmit 512 kB in a reasonable time, so clearly it has to be possible.
- Levitz 11mo agoWell yes, we had low resolution images, no consideration for different viewports, no non-default fonts and little interactivity beyond links or other queries to the server.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- baobun 11mo agoThere are plenty of anaytics options at <1% that size. https://github.com/Destiner/astro-analytics https://github.com/Destiner/astro-analytics