3 ms·
In theory you could limit the scope of the union to not include things like negotiating salary or defending workers from being fired. I don't think anything pre
by wongarsu 1y ago
In theory you could limit the scope of the union to not include things like negotiating salary or defending workers from being fired. I don't think anything prevents you from having a union that just fights for basic rights like good chairs, not having to review AI slop and not being exposed to asbestos.
Of course keeping the union narrowly focused is an issue. Unions are a democracy after all
- eru 1y ago> Of course keeping the union narrowly focused is an issue. Unions are a democracy after all Yep, and I don't want my neighbours to vote on the colour of my underwear or what I have for breakfast either. They can mind their business, and I can mind mine.