You switch from global automation to US car manufacturing in the first paragraph without a even a line break, basically equating them. The first graph you show

You switch from global automation to US car manufacturing in the first paragraph without a even a line break, basically equating them. The first graph you show is missing the corresponding table from the source which shows the exact opposite of what you have stated: the workforce had been steadily increasing until ~2019 and is in decline since then. Not massively but still it contradicts what you stated. Next you switch to Korea and the wage increase without aligning a corresponding price increase or adjust for inflation. Then you switch to the history on the industrial revolution. At that point I gave up because I know the point you are trying to make and I can see, you adjusted your samples to match that point.