4 ms·

Vanilla JavaScript

• gnabgib 1y ago
  Posted > 30 times, popular in: ~2023 (38 points, 8 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34952741 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34952741 ~2022 (11 points, 10 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31335495 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31335495 ~2015 (31 points, 10 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8842118 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8842118 2012 (208 points, 130 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4435547 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4435547
• theandrewbailey 1y ago
  I'm astounded how they can shove so many features and so much performance in such a tiny framework!
• anghunk 1y ago
  yeah，i like
• ItsBob 1y ago
  I really wish this wasn't called Vanilla JavaScript... that's what I call actual JavaScript, you know, the language without libraries! I don't normally feel strongly one way or the other about stuff but this really rips my knitting! Note: Credit to the creators for making something and puting it out there but man, that name :(
  • wunderlab 1y ago
    can't decide whether trolling or irony
    • ItsBob 1y ago
      Haha, not trolling. I tend not to use libraries for JS, preferring to write actual vanilla JavaScript, hence the reason the name rubs me up the wrong way :)