> Most models lack a robust understanding of the factive nature of knowledge, that knowledge inherently requires truth. I’d say that LLMs maybe understand bett

> Most models lack a robust understanding of the factive nature of knowledge, that knowledge inherently requires truth. I’d say that LLMs maybe understand better than we do, because of their lack of grandstanding classification of information, that belief and fact are tightly interwoven. There is a dichotomy that truth can exist while fiction can be widely accepted as truth without the ability for humans to distinguish which is which and all the while thinking that some or most can. I’m not pushing David Hume on you, but I think this is a learning opportunity.