There's a whole paragraph in the article which says basically the same as your point 3 ( "glass bouncing, instead of shattering, and ropes defying physics" is l

There's a whole paragraph in the article which says basically the same as your point 3 ( "glass bouncing, instead of shattering, and ropes defying physics" is literally a quote from the article). I don't see how you can claim the article missed it.