3 ms·
This is how the "Wikipedia Row" "Erupted" at Jimmy Wales: > It is a bad faith read of the community when suggesting that among the most read and debated articl
by thrance 1y ago
This is how the "Wikipedia Row" "Erupted" at Jimmy Wales:
> It is a bad faith read of the community when suggesting that among the most read and debated articles on the community is poorly done. there has been dozens of hours of discussion and rfcs galore to reach this version of the article and im certain there will be more. Consensus is always evolving but this article represents the latest consensus.
Seems very reasonable to me.
- dlubarov 1y agoUltimately it's a numbers game, and editors with an anti-Israeli agenda have the numbers. Jimbo's post reads as if he's encouraging chances so that the article adheres to NPOV, but I think he understands that's rather futile, and is really just trying to draw attention so that more readers will be aware of Wikipedia's biases.
- bluebarbet 1y agoWhile obviously you're right that in practice "it's a numbers game", it shouldn't be. That's the point.