6 ms·
You can make a lot of slop of all different sorts with LLMs. That has very little in common with building systems.
by QuercusMax 1y ago
You can make a lot of slop of all different sorts with LLMs. That has very little in common with building systems.
- 9rx 1y ago"Slop" suggests that the only difference is in quality, but the definition of engineer says nothing of quality. Perhaps you might consider using an LLM to build a system that creates a response that is more coherent?
- QuercusMax 1y agoSlop doesn't suggest the difference is only in quality, but also in form. Words have meanings, ya know? I can have an LLM generate me code-like text all day long, but that doesn't means it's building a system. Just like I can eat Chicken McNuggets all day long, but that doesn't mean I'm eating a roast chicken.
- 9rx 1y ago> I can have an LLM generate me code-like text all day long, but that doesn't means it's building a system. I don't follow. An LLM doesn't magically output code-like text, or anything else for that matter, on a whim. You have to build a system that describes your intent to the machine. Only then might it output code-like text, if that's what your system describes. It's not the execution of your code that makes you an engineer. It's building a system that can be executed in the first place that makes you a (software) engineer.
- QuercusMax 1y agoYou said a few comments upthread (and I quote): "What else can you do with code (and LLMs; same thing) other than build systems?" There are many things you can do with LLMs other than build systems. That's my point. Using an LLM doesn't make you an engineer; that's preposterous.
- 9rx 1y ago> There are many things you can do with LLMs other than build systems. Like what? The code-like output example clearly requires you to build a system before the LLM can evaluate your program. If I want an LLM to generate a bedtime story, I also need to build a system that defines that. Where do you find the escape? Maybe you're thinking of AGI? While everyone has their own pet AGI definition, many see it as being the point where you no longer have to build the system and the machine can start to take on that role. But we don't have that yet, and isn't what we're talking about anyway.
- lm28469 1y ago> the definition of engineer says nothing of quality The definition you used makes someone who maintain a twitter account or use a coffee machine an "engineer"... everyone is an engineer by that definition really
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 9rx 1y agoIt's not just the definition I use, it is the most common definition people use according to the records we keep. And yes, someone who builds a system to generate Twitter content or maintains a coffee machine are definitely engineers. Professional engineering societies don't like that fact and often try to usurp the term for their own financial gain, but that's not how English works. Definitions derive from use, not what a small group of people wish were so, and the record that keeps track of use is abundantly clear how the word is most commonly used.
- hitarpetar 1y agowow epic comeback man can you share the prompt you used to generate it?
- 9rx 1y agoI'm told you don't need to build a prompt. That would be engineering, which apparently isn't involved in the use of LLMs.