3 ms·
> I am not sure how we silently got ourselves into this position Two things: 1. converting all the old Polytechnics to Universities, in 1992, https://en.wiki
by DrBazza 1y ago
> I am not sure how we silently got ourselves into this position
Two things:
1. converting all the old Polytechnics to Universities, in 1992, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universities_in_the_United_Kingdom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universities_in_the_United_Kin...
followed by
2. trying to get '50%' of kids into further education https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/mar/08/johncarvel https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/mar/08/johncarvel
The state already paid for education to the age of 18. Another 3 years of specialized education costs (the state) more. Getting more kids into HE, costs more even when they fees that are still state subsidized. Hence the increase in unsubsidised foreign students.
It's debatable whether the desired outcome of better educated and 'more employable' 21 year olds was actually achieved, or whether it simply removed a large cohort from the unemployment figures.
- Urahandystar 1y agoIt could have been but what we say was application inflation where jobs that didn't require a degree suddenly needed one. I think unemployment figures is the most likely one, all we did was saddle a generation with an additional they won't pay back it is one of the worst government decisions of all time.