3 ms·
It wasn't for free. It was their work. Which, on average and until very recently, was much, much safer, and easier to do than the work of the other half of the
by wtcactus 1y ago
It wasn't for free. It was their work. Which, on average and until very recently, was much, much safer, and easier to do than the work of the other half of the population that had to leave the house and seek work to get a pay and allow the that half to stay at home.
- JetSpiegel 1y ago> It wasn't for free Say whaat? The woman's father literally paid good money to have her taken away. Everyone but the woman saw cash changing hands, but she was legally barred from owning property. Freedom was for men.
- wtcactus 1y agoIndulging for a moment that fantasy of yours about the purpose of dowries: If the present “owner” paid “good money” to take her away, doesn’t that mean she was a liability instead of an asset?
- JetSpiegel 1y agoThat "on average" is load bearing, does it include Queen Victoria? Just like ICE "allows" people to stay at Aligator Alcatraz. They should be paying rent! Of course, the indentured servants payed rent in kind, with their bodies, whether they like it or not.