3 ms·
They might've been trying freebsd back when pf wasn't well supported. Back when I last used openbsd (which might be nearly 20yrs ago now - eek), pf support on f
by antod 11mo ago
They might've been trying freebsd back when pf wasn't well supported. Back when I last used openbsd (which might be nearly 20yrs ago now - eek), pf support on freebsd was lagging quite a bit.
Not sure what things are like now though - I'm guessing it's much better as pf was obviously the best option :)
- laxd 11mo agoMy impression: * PF was imported into FreeBSD from OpenBSD, maybe it had problems at first. * Both implementations have been actively maintained, further developed, and diverged. * There is now collaboration in the development of the FreeBSD and OpenBSD implementations. * PF is the shit. Even though IPFW is the "invented here" firewall.
- sixdonuts 11mo agoYep, started on PF and the Palo and NSX FWs I use at the day job are a piece of cake.