3 ms·
Yes, I’m quite familiar with that. Chrome is why I added the “generally” qualifier. And to the best of my knowledge, there has not been any in-the-wild exploit
by brigade 11mo ago
Yes, I’m quite familiar with that. Chrome is why I added the “generally” qualifier.
And to the best of my knowledge, there has not been any in-the-wild exploit against Chrome through the handful of ffmpeg codecs they enable. Not even pwn2own type competitions either, as I recall.
- dpe82 11mo agoI guess I'm confused - are you trying to imply the lack of a thorough, publicly reported successful exploit (or us just not casually giving you one that you care about) means that we're all released from the responsibility of taking potential exploits seriously?