4 ms·

Ah, but doesn't this have the same problems all NLP systems have? It gives illusion of flexibility that gets shattered every time user allows himself to believe

Ah, but doesn't this have the same problems all NLP systems have? It gives illusion of flexibility that gets shattered every time user allows himself to believe in it. What if I prefer to write them in different order? Or if some version of named parameters is in use, what if I like some other synonym for height? Strict syntax is a good thing as long as it is also brittle. Now, an IDE that generates a training text like that on the fly and allows you to fill in the values without actually storing the training text would be nice. Something like intellisence popups, but inline and expanded.

Too 14y ago
> Now, an IDE that generates a training text like that on the fly and allows you to fill in the values without actually storing the training text would be nice. Something like intellisence popups, but inline and expanded. That's the best idea i've heard in a long time. The IDE already has the information but hovering every function call with the mouse to get parameter information is a PITA and breaks the flow of reading. A hotkey to inline them on all your code at once would be brilliant.