"We change programming. We turn it into something that's understandable by people." No, actually we don't. This has been attempted recursively since the 70's.

"We change programming. We turn it into something that's understandable by people." No, actually we don't. This has been attempted recursively since the 70's. It's not a credible or desirable goal. Programming is complex by nature. All powerfully flexible systems are. Being capable of (much less excelling at) mentally modelling complex abstract systems is not a trait that "normal" people posses. This is neither bad, nor wrong. It simply is. Ignoring this is pure folly.