4 ms·
> the most important work isn’t stopping AGI - it’s making sure we raise our AGI mind children well enough. Can we just take a pause and appreciate how nuts th
by throwaway290 1y ago
> the most important work isn’t stopping AGI - it’s making sure we raise our AGI mind children well enough.
Can we just take a pause and appreciate how nuts this article is?
- dyauspitr 1y agoIt isn’t. The kids are already getting stupider because they offload all their schoolwork to LLMs. There’s nothing nuts about this.
- throwaway290 1y agoHe's not talking about actual kids.
- card_zero 1y agoThat part of it is the reasonable part, instead of the usual idea that the AGI gets free knowledge/skills/wisdom/evil from something about its structure.
- throwaway290 1y agoIt's one thing to call a program your brainchild metaphorically but this feels literal given the rest of the article. I am amazed that people who unironically put a program on the same level as a person (I mean clearly that "child" will grow up) can influence these policies
- card_zero 1y agoMaybe it would have to be a device, not just a program. Or maybe it really is possible to emulate a person with the right program on current hardware. Who can say? The lack of physical interaction sounds less than ideal for its development, then.