4 ms·
That makes no sense. It was much longer than 10 years before people considered C to be tech debt for example. Idk if it will be 10 years exactly, but we are see
by samdoesnothing 11mo ago
That makes no sense. It was much longer than 10 years before people considered C to be tech debt for example. Idk if it will be 10 years exactly, but we are seeing better languages emerging (Swift 6, Mojo, probably others) that provide the same safety guarantees and performance/use case profiles as Rust, but are vastly more ergonomic and lovely to use. I fear Linux was hasty integrating Rust because it will likely prevent them from integrating something better in the near future.
- steveklabnik 11mo agoYou’re the one that said ten years.
- samdoesnothing 11mo agoI said ten years from now...
- kasabali 11mo agoYou're the one who said "ten years since Rust 1.0"
- Klonoar 11mo agoThe person who they replied to stated a decade. This whole thing is pretty clear cut and dry.
- steveklabnik 11mo agoRight, that’s when Rust was new and shiny. People who chase the latest new shiny thing don’t consider ten year old technology new and shiny, they’d have moved on years ago.