5 ms·
>"We used to think there were two types of diabetes" We still do. Honestly what a ridiculous way to introduce the article. Like there's already widespread con
by andrewfelix 14y ago
>"We used to think there were two types of diabetes"
We still do.
Honestly what a ridiculous way to introduce the article. Like there's already widespread consensus on there being three types of diabetes.
The cited articles barely prop up the authors assertions.
- vixen99 14y agoAnd who is the grand 'We'? Seems to me that you, along with some others, are getting a tad overheated. He goes on to say "The idea that Alzheimer’s might be Type 3 diabetes has been around since 2005, but the connection between poor diet and Alzheimer’s is becoming more convincing". A perfectly reasonable statement. This is a short opinion piece which will alert those interested to look further. If this is not to your liking then check out this one: http://www.monbiot.com/2012/09/10/the-mind-thieves/ http://www.monbiot.com/2012/09/10/the-mind-thieves/ which has plenty of references. May be right, may be wrong but it's an interesting idea.
- trentlott 14y agoIt's a blog post, not a paper.
- crisnoble 14y agoNot to mention the problems with the rest of that paragraph: >"the type you’re born with (Type 1) and the type you “get.” That’s called Type 2, and was called “adult onset” until it started ravaging kids. Type 2 is brought about by a combination of factors, including overeating, American-style." I have Type 1 Diabetes and I "got" it when I was 19. Type 1 means your pancreas has zero capability of producing insulin, Type 2 means your pancreas has reduced ability to regulate or has reduced insulin production capabilities. Maybe he could have said Type 1 is a genetic disorder and Type 2 is generally brought on due to environment or lifestyle.