4 ms·

No. Also irrelevant.

• AnthonyMouse 11mo ago
  It seems extremely relevant to the market definition that the alleged alternatives aren't actually substitutes for one another. If you have a car that runs on diesel fuel and there is only one company that sells diesel fuel, it seems like you want to claim that it's irrelevant and isn't a monopoly because there is another company of the same size that sells gasoline. Is it not relevant that you can't actually use that in your car?
  • torstenvl 11mo ago
    I don't understand why you need to be so dishonest about this. It remains the objective and inarguable fact that Apple does not have a monopoly here. Period. End of story. It simply isn't true. Whether their behavior is otherwise anticompetitive is a different issue. You are intentionally conflating them and it is morally repugnant for you to continue doing so.