4 ms·
I found John Gruber's roundup of tech company profits (not revenue) interesting: https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/10/30/apple-q4-results https://daringfir
by simonw 1y ago
I found John Gruber's roundup of tech company profits (not revenue) interesting: https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/10/30/apple-q4-results https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/10/30/apple-q4-result...
- Google (a.k.a. Alphabet): $35B
- Microsoft: $27.7B
- Apple: $27.5B
- Nvidia: $26.4B
- Amazon: $21.5B
- verzali 1y agoIs it a coincidence that 3 of 5 are so close?
- dmoy 1y agoPretty much coincidence, yes
- NaomiLehman 1y agoYes, completely different revenue sources.
- BerislavLopac 1y agoMANGA is the new FAANG.
- mixmastamyk 1y agoJust use BigTech, then you don't have to keep shuffling letters nor inserting Netflix to prevent it becoming a slur. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Tech https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Tech
- danaris 1y agoI suspect they meant Nvidia, not Netflix; after all, the letters in MANGA are exactly the initials of the companies listed in the post they were replying to.
- ghaff 1y agoThe N was really Netflix originally when it was the poster child for AWS consumption before NVIDEA/AI was even in the conversation. But, yes, "Big Tech" is probably the best term these days to avoid debates about whether this company or that company really belongs in the category--especially given that certain companies have done very well in terms of stock relative to the the historical FAANGs.
- raw_anon_1111 1y agoFANG (notice the missing A) was always a meaningless term. Cramer initially left Apple off and it was already the most valuable company, Microsoft was already in the top 5 most valuable and Netflix was t really that valuable then.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]