3 ms·
I'm good with this for a few reasons: First, it's an abuse of "voting" because the class that is being regulated is not represented equally in the vote. Secon
by exabrial 1y ago
I'm good with this for a few reasons:
First, it's an abuse of "voting" because the class that is being regulated is not represented equally in the vote.
Second, In the USA, our federal government would have a 0-star rating on charity navigator. Nearly all taxes simply go to pay down bad business deals or provide bailouts for billionaires and is largely a wealth transfer system to the 1%ers, meanwhile a massive campaign is ran that paying taxes is actually doing something. I can't speak to the French situation.
- slwvx 1y ago> I'm good with this... You're "good" with a wealth tax, or with it being voted against? I'm in favor of a wealth tax, say 1% on wealth over $10M. To see historical rates in the US and to play with possible taxes, see https://taxjusticenow.org https://taxjusticenow.org