2 ms·
>I was asking about Moscow. As I said there have been many attacks on Moscow. You can easily find stories for yourself such as this one: https://www.reuters.co
by wakawaka28 1y ago
>I was asking about Moscow.
As I said there have been many attacks on Moscow. You can easily find stories for yourself such as this one: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraines-drone-attack-forces-airport-closures-around-moscow-russia-says-2025-10-26/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraines-drone-attack-f...
>Ah yes, in line with their leader's propaganda that Ukraine has no culture of its own and should embrace conquest.
I've never heard this but it's irrelevant to whether or not the US should risk nuclear war over this.
>I forgot about all the American soldiers and pilots that have been captured by Russia while operating F-16s and Javelins and Patriots.
It is a fact that Ukraine does not know how to operate these systems, and they require data from US satellites. It takes quite a bit of training to get up to speed. Furthermore, if anything, Russia would flatten these systems with missiles rather than roll up to them and capture the operators.
>Probably whatever state television tells them to think.
The Russians know that their media is showing them propaganda. Certain Americans like yourself don't recognize that our media is also full of state-backed propaganda. This has been known for decades and some people never got the memo. It didn't stop with Operation Mockingbird. Our military literally has a psychological warfare division (like most others, probably).
>Clearly Putin doesn't think so or he'd withdraw. Let's just copy his homework and keep it going.
He will never withdraw. That is a suicidal fever dream. Are you a Ukrainian who drank the Kool-Aid that Zelinskyy is putting out? Or are you a propaganda agent?
- cosmicgadget 1y ago> You can easily find stories for yourself Which one mentions missile strikes that you previously claimed? Missile strikes. On Moscow. Not light planes. Not "on Russia". The statement you made above. > I've never heard this but it's irrelevant to whether or not the US should risk nuclear war over this. Putin has made numerous statements claiming the illegitimacy of Ukrainian statehood and culture. It's not relevant to the risk of nuclear war but it is relevant to the point I was replying to about functionaries echoing the bigotry. > It is a fact that Ukraine does not know how to operate these systems, and they require data from US satellites. It takes quite a bit of training to get up to speed. Haha and now you are backpedaling from "US soldiers are physically operating the equipment" to "well... nobody knows how to use a Patriot without training". What is your deal? Are you just used to talking to ill-informed people? Okay good you've stuck with it... > Russia would flatten these systems with missiles rather than roll up to them and capture the operators. And now you're an expert on military doctrine. Okay general, so every Patriot battery has been struck from the air. Then the Ukrainian soldiers hastily removed the bodies to prevent the Russians from discovering and publicizing the presence of American ground units after taking the territory. Then paid off the families of the US troops to not mention their death. And of course there is no satellite or fpv footage of these US troops. Or leak from the Ukrainian rank and file about US military on the front line. Honestly do you think for a minute before claiming something? > Certain Americans like yourself don't recognize that our media is also full of state-backed propaganda. Zzz. > He will never withdraw. That is a suicidal fever dream. Haha so who is to blame for nuclear tensions? The country not kinetically involved in the war (except with your ghost soldiers) or the madman who threatens nuclear escalation every five minutes? The person who you say wouldn't even withdraw from an offensive war if it meant nuclear holocaust? > Are you a Ukrainian who drank the Kool-Aid that Zelinskyy is putting out? Or are you a propaganda agent? Zzzzzzzz.