Crucial to distinguish between knowledge, fact, claim and allegation. Compare: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk#Assassination https://en.wikipedia.or

Crucial to distinguish between knowledge, fact, claim and allegation. Compare: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk#Assassination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk#Assassination https://grokipedia.com/page/Charlie_Kirk https://grokipedia.com/page/Charlie_Kirk : Assassination Details and Investigation This is an active case that has not gone to trial, and the alleged text messages and Discords have not had their forensics cross-examined. Yet Grokipedia is already citing them as fact, not allegation. (What is considered the correct neutral way to report on alleged facts in active cases?)