3 ms·
>> addictive products being engineered to be as addictive as possible and deliberately punch people's brains in such a way to make them stay The exact same arg
by supportengineer 11mo ago
>> addictive products being engineered to be as addictive as possible and deliberately punch people's brains in such a way to make them stay
The exact same argument could be used to make social media illegal.
- cyberax 11mo agoYou're saying it as if it's a bad thing. Limiting social media to be only used for communication, and not algorithms is a good thing.
- ToucanLoucan 11mo agoFuck yeah let's do it.
- skippyboxedhero 11mo agoHopefully, the responses to this have highlighted the kind of people you are dealing with. No-one can use social media because some people in our society can't control themselves. Socialise the losses.
- gassi 11mo agoYou can allow freedom of communication while restricting the algorithms that have poisoned an entire generation of children. https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2025/05/430011/yes-social-media-might-be-making-kids-depressed https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2025/05/430011/yes-social-media-mi...
- ToucanLoucan 11mo ago> Hopefully, the responses to this have highlighted the kind of people you are dealing with. You know I'm right here, if you have an actual rebuttal and not just dismissive hand-waving. > No-one can use social media because some people in our society can't control themselves. I think a lot of people would be measurably better off if not for social media that algorithmically fucks with their brains. > Socialise the losses. I mean that's kind of the point of a society yeah? We pool our efforts to enable greater labor specialization and to achieve things no individual can. Like an electrical grid or a highway system. And when parts of those systems break down, we all contribute a little to sorting them out.
- immibis 11mo ago...Good?