You're not alone. It has been working well for me, too. But maybe Omaha is well covered or I'm not using it enough. I have been wondering, though, whether th

You're not alone. It has been working well for me, too. But maybe Omaha is well covered or I'm not using it enough. I have been wondering, though, whether there has been any effort to quantify exactly how bad iOS 6 Maps really are. I mean: if this topic were about anything else, HN denizens would be quick to lecture us about how all the complaints are coming from a self-selected sample, not a random one, and how the examples are cherry-picked - not necessarily representative, and how the plural of anecdote is not data. While there are clearly a lot of errors (and some of them very funny) the world is a very, very big place. So I wonder how bad is "bad", really? What unit(s) of measurement would one use to quantify it? I imagine you would need a different unit of measurement for each kind of error: one for the melted bridge, one for not finding the Starbucks down the street, one for having an airport in the middle of a field...