4 ms·
> For example, how many humans can write hundred of lines of code (in seconds mind you) and regularly not have any syntax errors or bugs? Ez, just use codegen.
by ffsm8 1y ago
> For example, how many humans can write hundred of lines of code (in seconds mind you) and regularly not have any syntax errors or bugs?
Ez, just use codegen.
Also the second part (not having bugs) is unlikely to be true for the LLM generated code, whereas traditional codegen will actually generate code with pretty much no bugs.
- vidarh 1y agoI have Claude reducing the number of bugs in my traditional codegen right now.
- antonvs 1y agoWhat's your point? Traditional codegen tools are inflexible in the extreme compared to what LLMs can do. The realistic comparison is between humans and LLMs, not LLMs and codegen tools.
- ffsm8 1y agoThe point was that the listed argument of production tons of boilerplate code within a short period of time is a... Pointless metric to cite