3 ms·
So are you saying that Israelis have brought all those things to whom exactly?
by jimbohn 11mo ago
So are you saying that Israelis have brought all those things to whom exactly?
- thomassmith65 11mo agoTo arab israelis, certainly, along with druze, christians and anyone else in the country.
- jimbohn 11mo agoFeels like saying a kidnapper is "actually" feeding its prisoner, so after all it's not so bad. With all the money and political goodwill the US has spent on Israel, couldn't these good results be reached by anybody having that much capture on the US?
- thomassmith65 11mo agoThe comment to which I replied was "was there anything good that ever came from that Apartheid genocidal state?" The objection I have with that is that it's reductive. "It's not *so* bad" is different than "it's not *entirely* bad", and my objection stands, whether or not "someone else could achieve good results"
- jimbohn 11mo agoDo you feel like Apartheid and/or genocide are justified in this case?
- thomassmith65 11mo agoIf it's apartheid and if it's genocide, then of course not. To hold a strong opinion on whether those terms apply, I'd need more information than is available to the public, and go on a case by case basis.
- jimbohn 11mo agoI'm not particularly involved with the whole Israel/Palestine question yet I was unable to not find myself put in front of a lot of evidence, and I don't follow/have social media.
- thomassmith65 11mo agoThere invariably is evidence that supports two diametrically opposed narratives; what is missing is evidence to know which is true. For example: The IDF claims Hamas use civilians as human shields. Hamas denies it. Hamas claims the IDF targets civilians. The IDF denies it. And I, with no access to internal IDF communications, and no access to internal Hamas communications, don't know what to make of all the videos and articles supporting and debunking both claims.
- jimbohn 11mo agoWe can judge by the outcomes.
- thomassmith65 11mo agoIf the goal is to judge Israel and find it guilty of genocide, then we can choose some number of civilian deaths lower than Israel killed, and be done with it. If the goal is to determine whether Israel actually is guilty of genocide then that approach isn't useful.
- jimbohn 11mo agoDetermining if there is a genocide or not doesn't depend on the kill score but on factors which (ironically) find their highest experts among jews and Israelis (Lemkin, Bauer, Charny, Auron). Some of them have actually helped define the definition in the UN Genocide Convention. If you take a look at the definition, even before October 7th, Israel is pretty much committing a genocide. Regardless of the outcome, one of the key factors is intent, and after October 7th, lots of important Israeli figures came forward with unambiguous statements of their intent.