3 ms·
I've done that, FWIW, which isn't much. The solutions will likely be lost to science. Perhaps a future internet archaeologist will find and disseminate them to
by fargolime 14y ago
I've done that, FWIW, which isn't much. The solutions will likely be lost to science. Perhaps a future internet archaeologist will find and disseminate them to a more scientific audience.
- geoffschmidt 14y agoI understand that frustration can be hard to deal with but this attitude really doesn't advance your cause. No one likes to talk to whiny emo people. (Except at goth clubs where it can be kind of fun.)
- fargolime 14y agoBut I'm not frustrated, nor whining. I have no cause to advance; I no longer seek publication of my ideas. Your comment demonstrates the following thinking I've seen in today's scientific community though: If you have anything to say against blanket rejection of ideas based on subject matter, you're an even bigger crackpot (or whiner) than we assumed you were.
- VMG 14y agoBecause in most cases, that conclusion is correct as well. Your refusal to link to the actual PDFs doesn't inspire confidence either. You claim breakthroughs and leave us hanging, which isn't very nice.
- fargolime 14y agoLinking would be going too far off topic, which I won't do. It would indicate an ulterior motive I don't have. You'd need at least a good laymen's background in relativity theory to understand my work. If you have that, you can give me a way to contact you and I'll do that after this discussion has scrolled off others' lists.
- gknoy 14y agoYou could also link to your website in your user summary, and have it easily accessible for tangential conversations.
- seles 14y agoLink?