Don't tell me what the original claim was. You contorted it to mean that it's literally impossible to write "quality software" in vim/emacs. I did NOT claim t

Don't tell me what the original claim was. You contorted it to mean that it's literally impossible to write "quality software" in vim/emacs. I did NOT claim this. Nobody would claim this either. I wouldn't make such claim even about nano or notepad or any text editor (of which there and hundreds and thousands) for that matter. What an insane thing to contest even. Would I attribute quality of software to - in any shape or form - to the text editor it was written in - whether written in nano, notepad or vim or emacs or god knows what else? No, I would not. That WAS the original claim.