5 ms·
the canary notification method is a lack of updates, not a specific update. you update your canary to say that nothing has changed, at a known cadence. if you
by 8note 1y ago
the canary notification method is a lack of updates, not a specific update.
you update your canary to say that nothing has changed, at a known cadence.
if you ever dont make the update, readers know that the canary has expired, and so you have been served a gag order warrant.
changing or removing the canary in response to a warrant is illegal. not changing it is legal.
for an equivalent cloudwatch setup, its checking the flag for "alarm when there's no points"
- verdverm 1y agoI would think to stopping doing something is equally an action as to do something, in regards to warrant canaries and gag orders. You had to take make some change to your process, or if automated take an actual action to disable. In either case, there was a cognizant choice that was made
- hrimfaxi 1y agoYes but the theory, at least in the US, is that the government cannot compel you to say something. That is, they can't make you put up a notice.
- joshuamorton 1y agoMore specifically, the theory is that cannot compel you to lie, there are all kinds of cases where businesses are compelled to share specific messages.
- Andrex 1y agoAh, that was confusing to me. Thank you.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- yencabulator 1y agoAs far as I've seen, the examples of that have always been things like health warnings and ingredients lists, where showing that message is a condition of being in that (licensed) business, and applies equally to any company. Do you have a more custom example in mind?
- joshuamorton 1y agoAll sorts of consent decrees, a huge amount of union and workplace law requires things to be posted for employees.
- yencabulator 1y agoFor employee things, I can understand being required to notify parties in agreements the company has entered into. As far as I understand, consent degrees are settlements and as such a mutually-agreed mechanism for ending a lawsuit early; their terms are whatever the parties negotiate and do not come from the government.
- joshuamorton 1y agoTo be more precise, the law requires employees to publish the nlrb notice in well trafficked or otherwise conspicuous locations. I think there are other places where "government mandated corporation inform people of their rights" is a thing, especially with things like data use and sharing. In terms of consent decrees, that was the wrong example. But lots of judgements do involve various notification requirements.
- yencabulator 1y agoCar manufacturer warranty recall letters are probably a good example. I get them even though I've never done business with the car manufacturer -- I bought the vehicle from a private party. But that still sort of connects (at least in my mind) to health warnings etc. What do you think of this angle: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45892680 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45892680
- verdverm 1y agoyea, I get that, but my gut tells me this doesn't pass the sniff test It's a choice you make and action you take either way, be it not updating a canary or sending a covert financial transaction That it has not been tested in court is why it's still a "theory" (hypothesis?) My hope is that a jury of our peers would stay closer to the spirit than the letter of the law
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- nkrisc 1y agoThe legal theory is that in the US the first amendment prevents the government from forcing you to make a false update. I don’t know if it’s ever been tested. As I understand, this theory wouldn’t even hold up in other countries where you could be compelled to make such a false update.
- yencabulator 1y agoWhat if I, sometimes, annually paint a canvas with an artistic interpretation of a canary bird? Can a government compel me to make an artistic expression with specific content, at my own expense? What if I'm just not in the right kind of creative mood to make it a good painting? Or maybe I can bill the government for the compelled artwork -- I'm afraid I'm tremendously expensive as an artist.
- shkkmo 1y agoAnd this would be why warrant canaries aren't seen as a proven legal shield yet.
- Fnoord 1y agoYes, the equivalent of a warning canary would be that Google pays the Israeli government a set of payment every month such as 3100 shekels (for +31, NL) and then suddenly November 2025 they stop issuing it. That would mean there's a legal investigation targeting Google by the Dutch prosecutor (OM) involving Israeli data. I suspect they didn't go for this route as it is too slow.