I don't disagree with your take. My take on your take is that via what I'm suggesting I can envision that the low-code/no-code tooling can be expanded to produc

I don't disagree with your take. My take on your take is that via what I'm suggesting I can envision that the low-code/no-code tooling can be expanded to produce a wider variety of more flexible programs with robust, consistent C# code underpinning them.