5 ms·
Look at the slide entitled Gmail (5), and compare the picture with the first graph on my blog post http://jeremykun.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/the-perceptron-and-
by j2kun 14y ago
Look at the slide entitled Gmail (5), and compare the picture with the first graph on my blog post http://jeremykun.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/the-perceptron-and-all-the-things-it-cant-perceive/ http://jeremykun.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/the-perceptron-and...
It just goes to show, Google steals content without attribution just like everyone else.
- pav3l 14y agoWait, they just used your graph and didn't even contact you about it?
- j2kun 14y agoShocking, right? I demand compensation! :)
- gms 14y agoIt's one guy who happens to work for Google, rather than the whole company.
- j2kun 14y agoI imagine they have a release process to get something on research.google.com, though. So the company is endorsing it.
- gms 14y agoWhat do you expect them to do? Somehow do an image-similarity search throughout the web for every image used in papers by their employees?
- nine_k 14y agoBTW completely feasible with Google's resources. Can be fully automated, too.
- jackpirate 14y agoYeah, it's not like they just have a giant image search engine laying around!
- j2kun 14y agoI would expect them to read it once, and bounce it back to the author saying something along the lines of "Cite your sources, please." That's certainly within Google's power, no?
- chmodd 14y agoThey do (almost) the same thing at youtube, don't they?
- carlosaguayo 14y agoNo, but you would expect some kind of seriousness... Universities don't need to run image-similarity through papers published by their students right? Plagiarism is a big thing.
- gms 14y agoRight. They tell them the policy and make sure it is understood, then they trust them because they cannot police every single image.
- patmcguire 14y agoYouTube already has copyright infringement bots that mark copyrighted content and either give the holder the option to put ads on it or take it down. Search also puts a lot of effort into identifying duplicated content to punish content farms. I've heard they're making progress on detecting algorithmically spun articles too (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_spinning http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_spinning). Oh, and they have it for images. Here's the search result for the one they used: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivFQlmjC8rcxWC0MZUxadqDHehMN1NsEpPmzc8yBq59X9o3IR4bQr1jdwzRuS4npunwjwDXiEOjo5Z2nP-y_15uKJUAfBvUFY7LwAvobN9keAArJbKJ9wLDpofqyOcRLRigL92DAwkPDV8qX86HKscM6dxK0Hxz_1rN0iPk28ap52PWhw97t093vV_1Ig_1fwTSwcjHLFHkMUe_1vigsLRHRznzVEiifKXmd7n5zVynCCT7u7rY-L5DGrwer97S6Qirjfh58UJDYBOYgzUSolMoyG06pMASdE5o_1kK0L94m6gBX8IJRRnjfhfKzRF7ZZHpJzcPTKLqMytTg_1Y6EhjbnVE_1Q5rA3zxn2AXNWuf2IMTL7JXgdMsC5ne7qXRDqlNozPhrWIPdjjzQdvefJOZEg1c8jdH78ZJPnNdVxSRy00uFPDBf0TrSAOr7F1u87_1IzQqD912r5Cvg_16f3uCJjn-E0ssVx7nqRe1ZKVxDAaZ_1ON6EH14uuuIqwtRLiKNwEkZ2Q2iGvxb5yggXRdV-WAFDa0771yqzNUhjsbiTxa1HxHPjkMCF8dJ_1Ibrfeg3BbGndlkpMN94yBP5j0yHUTD7fwymk0lE2jA&num=10&hl=en&bih=936&biw=1680 https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivFQlmjC8rcxWC0MZ... So yes, it'd be trivial for them to do so.
- Muzza 14y agoUsing the same logic, a company can never be said to "do" anything. Everything is (ultimately) done by a real person.
- iamaaronlol 14y agoThe difference is in whether or not the individual is representing a company.
- tlammens 14y agoI am trying really hard to ignore the Futurama picture. Really hard!
- j2kun 14y agoAt least I gave the source :) And I don't claim I'm any better.