5 ms·

The reasonable interpretation of such a project is not to pump the stock market even higher by getting children to invest their savings into it, but to inculcat

• tinfoilhatter 1y ago
  The Rothschild bloodline is responsible for helping to orchestrate every modern war since the Napoleonic Wars, by loaning money to both sides of the conflict. Major General Smedley D. Butler wrote about this in War is a Racket. I personally, don't give a damn what Mr. Rothschild would be fine with, or the rest of his disgusting family.
  • FredPret 1y ago
    Standard antisemitic trope
    • tinfoilhatter 1y ago
      Standard bs defense to prevent any legitimate criticism of Jewish people no matter how reprehensible their actions are. Please spare me. Maybe we should get into what Natalie Rothschild said while being interviewed, about her family's fondness for incest? Or would that be anti-Semtiic as well? What exactly can you say about the Rothschild bloodline (except for praising them) that isn't considered anti-Semitic? Please do tell!
      • FredPret 11mo ago
        To your credit, your original comment didn't mention all Jews, just made heavy allusions to stereotypes about them. But now you've removed all possible doubt about what you meant. Criticize individuals all you want, but don't do it by "bloodline", ethnicity, or whether they're a banker or not. Agency lies with the individual.
        • tinfoilhatter 11mo ago
          I am criticizing individuals - individuals who are members of a bloodline that have historically engaged in war profiteering and have been instrumental in running the international central banking cartel. You're right that I didn't mention all Jews, because that would indeed be anti-Semitic. Sorry but I'm not going to kowtow to your ridiculous logic. It's perfectly fair to lob criticism at bloodlines, and if you had ever opened a history book you would readily understand that.
          • FredPret 11mo ago
            Criticizing individuals because they're part of a bloodline / ethnicity is: - the exact opposite of criticizing individuals; you're really just going after the group - the definition of prejudice - the foundation of most (all?) giant human catastrophes like the Holocaust, the various communist land reforms, the crusades, and all sorts of horrible events I'm a conservative, but I have to say this idea of not being prejudiced is really something great that liberalism brought to the table over the past 100-200 years. I'm gobsmacked to see people rejecting this idea.
            • tinfoilhatter 11mo ago
              So when authors of history-related works criticize or make remarks about bloodlines such as the Hapsburgs or the Medicis or the Colonnas are you equally as outraged as when it involves a bloodline of Jewish people? If I navigate to - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_the_Rothschild_family https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_the_Rothschild_fa... - every section of the page mentions the family being involved in banking. Am I stereotyping members of the Rothschild bloodline by saying they're involved in international banking? I don't think so. I'm equally gobsmacked by people who claim we shouldn't utilize pattern recognition or who want to pretend stereotypes materialize out of thin air.
              • ryandrake 11mo ago
                I think the word "bloodline" has gotten people wrapped around the axle. You could have just said "the Rothschild family" and been in the clear. "Bloodline" veers a little close to smearing an entire ethnicity over the actions of one relatively small family. I'm sure it's not what you meant, but as soon as you start talking about the contents of people's blood, people's ears start perking up and looking for bigotry.
• random9749832 1y ago
  Narrative: You are teaching about the intricacies of finance and the stock market. Reality: Dump everything into Nvidia / S&P 500. Number go up.