They can be facts. Sometimes they get thing right, sometimes wrong like other sources. Now "Responses from LLMs are not facts" in not a fact. I guess it provid

They can be facts. Sometimes they get thing right, sometimes wrong like other sources. Now "Responses from LLMs are not facts" in not a fact. I guess it provides a kind of meta illustration of not believing everything you read. A more subtle problem is they are poor as citations as they can change rapidly unlike saying say, last weeks NYT said so and so.