3 ms·
> Actually Apple are pretty bad at picking phone materials period. Which is funny, because they filed a patent[1] over two years ago for a process to make scra
by vonmoltke 14y ago
> Actually Apple are pretty bad at picking phone materials period.
Which is funny, because they filed a patent[1] over two years ago for a process to make scratch-resistant stainless steel.
[1] http://www.geek.com/articles/apple/apple-to-patent-process-for-scratch-resistant-stainless-steel-2010111/ http://www.geek.com/articles/apple/apple-to-patent-process-f...
- spartango 14y agoStainless steel is a pretty interesting material, but probably not a good choice for this design. A new variant of stainless probably makes it an even poorer choice (because full characterization is a prerequisite): - Some variants of stainless steel are ferromagnetic, which would mess with the compass. - Steel has very poor RF transparency, which would impact performance even with glass windows. - Steel is heavy. - Steel is far more difficult to machine: with Al you can easily (quickly, with little resistance) mill the curves and cavities that Apple likes for unibody design. Meanwhile steel chips, heats, and provides much resistance to a mill. It requires more finishing and incurs more tool wear.
- vonmoltke 14y agoI agree there are drawbacks to stainless and that it would be difficult to design a cellphone or other RF device entirely or predominantly from it. However, the patent does show that they have gone so far as to research and patent a process for improving a material for use in their portable devices. This makes the apparent lack of care in choosing the anodized aluminum for the iPhone 5 surprising and disappointing.