3 ms·
(Tailscalar) I'm very bullish on WebTransport in the future, but, it doesn't solve for NAT traversal. I'm watching keenly as well how Iroh gets on with QAD, rel
by raggi 1y ago
(Tailscalar) I'm very bullish on WebTransport in the future, but, it doesn't solve for NAT traversal. I'm watching keenly as well how Iroh gets on with QAD, relatedly.
If it all comes together this may well become more magic :D
- apitman 1y agoBut this is specifically for relays, so you shouldn't need NAT traversal right? ie in the browser you already know p2p isn't going to work (unless Tailscale implements WebRTC support) so you just go straight to relays for everything. I hadn't heard about iroh using QAD. Thanks for that.
- raggi 1y agoTrue, the relays currently use http and have a web socket path. The web based ssh client in the admin panel uses this transport.