4 ms·
The case I cited specifically talked about government doing it.
by dmitrygr 1y ago
The case I cited specifically talked about government doing it.
- cosmicgadget 1y agoFor facial recognition or just plain photography? Obviously Katz predates the former.
- dmitrygr 1y agoKatz jut said "what a person knowingly exposes to the public" IIRC. We'd need a new SCOTUS case to clarify whether data derived from physical features that can be used to identify you still counts as such
- cosmicgadget 1y agoAgreed. > what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected. Identity might be, might not be.