3 ms·
Python might have been better at this but the community was struggling with the 2 vs 3 rift for years. Maybe new tooling will change it, but my personal opinion
by odyssey7 1y ago
Python might have been better at this but the community was struggling with the 2 vs 3 rift for years. Maybe new tooling will change it, but my personal opinion is that python does not scale very well beyond a homework assignment. That is its sweet spot: student-sized projects.
- Me001 1y ago[dead]
- morshu9001 1y agoImo the community should've rejected Python 3 and said, find a way to improve things without breaking everyone. JS managed to do it.
- pansa2 1y agoThe community basically did reject Python 3, at first. Almost nobody used 3.0 / 3.1 / 3.2, to the point where I’ve seen them retconned as beta releases. Even then though, the core developers made it clear that breaking everyone’s code was the only thing they were willing to do (remember Guido’s big “No 2.8” banner at PyCon?), which left the community with no choice.
- morshu9001 1y agoYeah I was in the middle of that and had to keep switching between versions because of how many things were Py2 only or Py3 only. Extra annoying how v3 changed random things like integer division that's mess you up if you forgot.