3 ms·
If you want to understand exactly what we are building, read our blogs and then our paper https://extropic.ai/writing https://extropic.ai/writing https://arxiv
by trevor_extropic 1y ago
If you want to understand exactly what we are building, read our blogs and then our paper
https://extropic.ai/writing https://extropic.ai/writing
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23972 https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23972
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- throwaway_7274 1y agoI was hoping the preprint would explain the mysterious ancient runes on the device chassis :(
- ipsum2 1y agoThe answer is that they're cosplaying sci-fi movies, in attempt to woo investors.
- simonerlic 1y agoWhat, is a bit of whimsy illegal?
- dmos62 1y agoWhy are you replying under every other comment here in this low effort, negative manner?
- helicone 1y agoi think they're a hater
- helicone 1y agoi dig it. people are so scared of losing market share because of art choice they make all of their products smooth dark grey rectangles with no features. ugly. at least this one has some sense of beauty, the courage to make a decision about what looks good to them and act on it. they'll probably have to change the heptagon shape because no way that becomes a standard it costs so little to add artistic flair to a product, its really a shame fewer companies do
- peteforde 1y agoYou might like Storm Summoner. https://kabaragoya.com https://kabaragoya.com
- helicone 1y agoyeah this is a great example!
- WorldPeas 1y agoWhen I was a child, I was so enchanted by the look of the Cray supercomputers of old with their in-built furniture and great open arrays of status indicators. There is really something to making a machine show you the wonder of creation it unlocks
- ehnto 1y agoIt looks super cool. I feel like I'm watching cyberpunk come to life with the way we're talking about technology these days, but this also looks straight out of the Neuromancer of my imagination.
- helicone 1y agocan you play doom on it, yet?
- chermi 1y agoCould you explain to me how you could reasonably justify not citing even one of Normal Computing's works? I can't imagine you're unaware of them or their works. You cite the Thermodynamic Computing group paper.