3 ms·
Idk, for me ruff was more of a game changer. No more explaining why we need both flake8 and pylint (and isort), no more flake8 plugins... Just one command that
by NewJazz 1y ago
Idk, for me ruff was more of a game changer. No more explaining why we need both flake8 and pylint (and isort), no more flake8 plugins... Just one command that does it all.
UV is great but I use it as a more convenient pip+venv. Maybe I'm not using it to it's full potential.
- zahlman 1y ago> Maybe I'm not using it to it's full potential. You aren't, but that's fine. Everyone has their own idea about how tooling should work and come together, and I happen to be in your camp (from what I can tell). I actively don't want an all-in-one tool to do "project management".
- hirako2000 1y agoThe dependencies descriptor is further structured, a requirements.txt is pretty raw in comparison. But where it isn't a matter of opinion is, speed. Never met anyone who given then same interface, would prefer a process taking 10x longer to execute.
- collinmanderson 1y agoI agree flake8 -> ruff was more of a game changer for me than pip+venv -> uv. I use flake8/ruff for more often than pip/venv. uv is probably much more of a game changer for beginner python users who just need to install stuff and don't need to lint. So it's a bigger deal for the broader python ecosystem.