3 ms·
Good - it costs the company more $$$ and cheating is still easy as hell. We have proof that the "Anal beads chess cheating" accusations could have been legit (
by Der_Einzige 1y ago
Good - it costs the company more $$$ and cheating is still easy as hell.
We have proof that the "Anal beads chess cheating" accusations could have been legit (https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish). You think that people won't do even easier cheating for a chance at a 500K+ FAANG job?
Also, if you want the best jobs at Foundation model labs (1 million USD starting packages), they will reject you for not using AI.
- whimsicalism 1y agolow quality comment > they will reject you for not using AI. False - many biglabs will explicitly ask you to not use AI in portions of their interview loop. > We have proof that the "Anal beads chess cheating" accusations could have been legit (https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish). You think that people won't do even easier cheating for a chance at a 500K+ FAANG job? Just nonsense. > 1 million USD starting packages False.
- mooreds 1y ago> they will reject you for not using AI. Well, I don't work for a foundation model lab. But actually, I'm happy for folks to use AI to augment their skills. I also want to make sure that they can use it well and aren't just a mouthpiece for ChatGPT. Having them come in is one way to verify that.