3 ms·
We've decided to do onsites for all hires, in part to combat this.
by mooreds 1y ago
We've decided to do onsites for all hires, in part to combat this.
- Der_Einzige 1y agoGood - it costs the company more $$$ and cheating is still easy as hell. We have proof that the "Anal beads chess cheating" accusations could have been legit (https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish). You think that people won't do even easier cheating for a chance at a 500K+ FAANG job? Also, if you want the best jobs at Foundation model labs (1 million USD starting packages), they will reject you for not using AI.
- whimsicalism 1y agolow quality comment > they will reject you for not using AI. False - many biglabs will explicitly ask you to not use AI in portions of their interview loop. > We have proof that the "Anal beads chess cheating" accusations could have been legit (https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish https://github.com/RonSijm/ButtFish). You think that people won't do even easier cheating for a chance at a 500K+ FAANG job? Just nonsense. > 1 million USD starting packages False.
- mooreds 1y ago> they will reject you for not using AI. Well, I don't work for a foundation model lab. But actually, I'm happy for folks to use AI to augment their skills. I also want to make sure that they can use it well and aren't just a mouthpiece for ChatGPT. Having them come in is one way to verify that.
- crims0n 1y agoSame, between the interview cheating and AI slop resumes... hiring has become a dreadful process.
- mooreds 1y agoYeah, hiring was always hard but has just become mind bogglingly difficult.