3 ms·
We already knew that the poorer countries are impacted worse by the IPv4 shortages. CG-NAT didn't solve anything but only delayed long enough to do even more da
by some_bird 11mo ago
We already knew that the poorer countries are impacted worse by the IPv4 shortages.
CG-NAT didn't solve anything but only delayed long enough to do even more damage.
Now these already poor countries also have to do CG-NAT, which is very expensive.
They cannot afford this.
I guess that a poor country could go with only IPv6?
Local services would be IPv6-only as well and most popular services already have IPv6.
And everyone else would have to make this switch eventually, so there'd be benefits...