4 ms·

So if a government agency or court (presumably the US government) makes a data request with a non disclosure order (FBI NSL, FISA, SCA) - Google and Amazon woul

• alwa 1y ago
  I imagine it depends on which country makes that request, its legal basis, and how their gag order is written. I find it hard to imagine a federal US order wouldn’t proscribe this cute “wink” payment. (Although who knows? If a state or locality takes it upon themselves to raid a bit barn, can their local courts bind transnational payments or is that federal jurisdiction?) But from the way it’s structured—around a specific amount of currency corresponding to a dialing code of the requesting nation—it sure sounds like they’re thinking more broadly. I could more easily imagine an opportunistic order—say, from a small neighboring state compelling a local contractor to tap an international cable as it crosses their territory—to accommodate the “winking” disclosure: by being either so loosely drafted or so far removed from the parent company’s jurisdiction as to make the $billions contract worth preserving this way.
• IAmBroom 1y ago
  In a nation that strictly follows its own laws, sure.
  • votepaunchy 1y ago
    Your terms are acceptable.
• breppp 1y ago
  and your assumption is that if Google has conflicting legal obligations to the USA and Israel it will choose Israel... In my opinion that's extremely unlikely. This was probably set up for other kinds of countries
  • NickC25 1y ago
    [flagged]