I get the sentiment and it’s a fair shot at license cosplay but it ain’t gonna hold. No definitions. What is AI for the purpose of this license? What is a natu

I get the sentiment and it’s a fair shot at license cosplay but it ain’t gonna hold. No definitions. What is AI for the purpose of this license? What is a natural person? At some point the text makes distinction between AI, ML, and autonomous agents. Is my RSS reader an autonomous agent? It is an agent as defined by, say, HTTP spec or W3C. And it’s autonomous. Author also mentions that any MIT software could use this instead. It most certainly could not. This is very much not an open source license and is not compatible with any FLOSS license. I don’t see it taking off in any meaningful way given how much effort is required to ensure compliance. It also seems way to easy to sabotage deployment of such software by maliciously directing AI agents at such deployments. Heck, even at public source code. Say, OP publishes something under this license, an AI slurps it from the canonical repo. What OP’s gonna do?