4 ms·

>> The modern commercial web is an adversarial network of attention theft and annoyance It feels like $10 / month would be sufficient to solve this problem. Ye

>> The modern commercial web is an adversarial network of attention theft and annoyance It feels like $10 / month would be sufficient to solve this problem. Yet, we've all insisted that everything must be free.

cmeacham98 1y ago
Where do I cut the $10/month? No like seriously, I'd easily pay $10/month to never see another ad, cookie banner, dark pattern, or have my information resold again. As long as that $10 is promised to never increase, other than adjustments for inflation. But I can't actually make that payment - except maybe by purchasing a paid adblocker - where ironically the best open source option (uBlock Origin) doesn't even accept donations.
- lobochrome 1y ago
  Kagi.com
  - MengerSponge 1y ago
    Setting up Kagi is as big an improvement to search as an ad blocker is to your general internet experience. After about a week you forget how bad the bare experience is, and after a month you'll never go back.
    - brendoelfrendo 1y ago
      I'm definitely behind some of my peers on adopting LLMs for general knowledge questions and web search, and I wonder if this is why. Kagi does have AI tools, but their search is ad free and good enough that I can usually find what I'm looking for with little fuss.
- didibus 1y ago
  You'd need to pay a lot more, because advertisers pay way more than 10$ per month per user, you'd have to outpay the advertisers.
  - pasteldream 1y ago
    How much do advertisers pay per customer, and where can I find this analysis?
    - JoeyPriceless 1y ago
      Meta publishes some interesting data along these lines in their quarterly reports. I think the most telling is the breakdown of Average Revenue Per User per region for Facebook specifically [1]. The average user brought in about $11 per quarter while the average US/CA user brought in about $57 per quarter during 2023. [1] https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2023/q4/Earnings-Presentation-Q4-2023.pdf https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2023/q4... (page 15)
- lynx97 1y ago
  Add actual accessibility on top, and I'd happily pay 20 EUR/month.
  - devinprater 1y ago
    Yes please!
- barnabee 1y ago
  Now Meta does paid ad free for my private Instagram account I feel like my online world is pretty close to ad free. It’s closer to $100 than $10 though, for all the services I pay for to avoid ads, and you still need ad blockers for the rest of the internet.
lynx97 1y ago
Ads are not the only problem with the modern web. Accessibility (or, the lack thereof) is more of an issue for me. 20 years ago, we were still hopeful the Internet would bring opportunities to blind people. These days, I am convinced the war has been lost and modern web devs and their willingness to adopt every new nonesense are the people that hurt me most in current society.
cameldrv 1y ago
It's a lot more than that. The U.S. online ad market is something like $400-500 billion, so that's about $100/mo per person. The problem is that some people are worth a lot more to advertise to than others. Someone who uses the internet a lot and has a lot of disposable income might be more like $500+ a month.
- osigurdson 1y ago
  There is no way that spending $100 per month on advertising to me is good value.
  - redwall_hp 1y ago
    The more visible and annoying ads are, the more effort (and money) I will spend buying from competitors and actively dissuading other people from buying the product.
    - cameldrv 1y ago
      Presumably most people aren't like you though or companies wouldn't spend $500 billion on it.
barnabee 1y ago
I now pay for: - Kagi - YouTube Premium - Spotify Premium - Meta ad-free - A bunch of substacks and online news publications - Twitter Pro or whatever it’s called On top of that I aggressively ad-block with extensions and at DNS level and refuse to use any app with ads. I have most notifications disabled, too. It is a lot better, but it’s more like N * $10 than $10 per month.
- prussia 1y ago
  I'm not familiar with YouTube or Spotify premium, so this may be a dumb question. But, doesn't Youtube Premium include Youtube Music? So why pay for Spotify premium too?
  - srg0 1y ago
    Pro Spotify: existing playlists and history, better artists info, better UI. YouTube Music is both better and worse: UI has some usability issues and unfortunately it shares likes and playlists with the normal YouTube account, as a library it has lots of crap uploaded by YouTube users, often wrong metadata, but thanks to that it also has some niche artists and recordings which are not available on other platforms.
    - xnx 1y ago
      > Pro Spotify: existing playlists and history It doesn't address the other reasons, but there are some free tools for moving Spotify playlists to YouTube.
  - redwall_hp 1y ago
    To stop the same two companies from owning everything? YouTube Music and Apple Music are shameless anticompetitive moves, leveraging market dominance to move into other existing markets. (I'll afford more lenience to Apple Music, since iTunes was already huge, being the undisputed king of music sales before streaming subscriptions took off.) I've also been using Spotify for longer than YouTube Music, or its predecessor that Google killed (as they do periodically) even exited.
BeFlatXIII 1y ago
$10/mo, paid to whom?

cmeacham98 1y ago

Where do I cut the $10/month? No like seriously, I'd easily pay $10/month to never see another ad, cookie banner, dark pattern, or have my information resold again. As long as that $10 is promised to never increase, other than adjustments for inflation. But I can't actually make that payment - except maybe by purchasing a paid adblocker - where ironically the best open source option (uBlock Origin) doesn't even accept donations.

lobochrome 1y ago
Kagi.com
- MengerSponge 1y ago
  Setting up Kagi is as big an improvement to search as an ad blocker is to your general internet experience. After about a week you forget how bad the bare experience is, and after a month you'll never go back.
  - brendoelfrendo 1y ago
    I'm definitely behind some of my peers on adopting LLMs for general knowledge questions and web search, and I wonder if this is why. Kagi does have AI tools, but their search is ad free and good enough that I can usually find what I'm looking for with little fuss.
didibus 1y ago
You'd need to pay a lot more, because advertisers pay way more than 10$ per month per user, you'd have to outpay the advertisers.
- pasteldream 1y ago
  How much do advertisers pay per customer, and where can I find this analysis?
  - JoeyPriceless 1y ago
    Meta publishes some interesting data along these lines in their quarterly reports. I think the most telling is the breakdown of Average Revenue Per User per region for Facebook specifically [1]. The average user brought in about $11 per quarter while the average US/CA user brought in about $57 per quarter during 2023. [1] https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2023/q4/Earnings-Presentation-Q4-2023.pdf https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2023/q4... (page 15)
lynx97 1y ago
Add actual accessibility on top, and I'd happily pay 20 EUR/month.
- devinprater 1y ago
  Yes please!
barnabee 1y ago
Now Meta does paid ad free for my private Instagram account I feel like my online world is pretty close to ad free. It’s closer to $100 than $10 though, for all the services I pay for to avoid ads, and you still need ad blockers for the rest of the internet.

lynx97 1y ago

Ads are not the only problem with the modern web. Accessibility (or, the lack thereof) is more of an issue for me. 20 years ago, we were still hopeful the Internet would bring opportunities to blind people. These days, I am convinced the war has been lost and modern web devs and their willingness to adopt every new nonesense are the people that hurt me most in current society.

cameldrv 1y ago

It's a lot more than that. The U.S. online ad market is something like $400-500 billion, so that's about $100/mo per person. The problem is that some people are worth a lot more to advertise to than others. Someone who uses the internet a lot and has a lot of disposable income might be more like $500+ a month.

osigurdson 1y ago
There is no way that spending $100 per month on advertising to me is good value.
- redwall_hp 1y ago
  The more visible and annoying ads are, the more effort (and money) I will spend buying from competitors and actively dissuading other people from buying the product.
  - cameldrv 1y ago
    Presumably most people aren't like you though or companies wouldn't spend $500 billion on it.

barnabee 1y ago

I now pay for: - Kagi - YouTube Premium - Spotify Premium - Meta ad-free - A bunch of substacks and online news publications - Twitter Pro or whatever it’s called On top of that I aggressively ad-block with extensions and at DNS level and refuse to use any app with ads. I have most notifications disabled, too. It is a lot better, but it’s more like N * $10 than $10 per month.

prussia 1y ago
I'm not familiar with YouTube or Spotify premium, so this may be a dumb question. But, doesn't Youtube Premium include Youtube Music? So why pay for Spotify premium too?
- srg0 1y ago
  Pro Spotify: existing playlists and history, better artists info, better UI. YouTube Music is both better and worse: UI has some usability issues and unfortunately it shares likes and playlists with the normal YouTube account, as a library it has lots of crap uploaded by YouTube users, often wrong metadata, but thanks to that it also has some niche artists and recordings which are not available on other platforms.
  - xnx 1y ago
    > Pro Spotify: existing playlists and history It doesn't address the other reasons, but there are some free tools for moving Spotify playlists to YouTube.
- redwall_hp 1y ago
  To stop the same two companies from owning everything? YouTube Music and Apple Music are shameless anticompetitive moves, leveraging market dominance to move into other existing markets. (I'll afford more lenience to Apple Music, since iTunes was already huge, being the undisputed king of music sales before streaming subscriptions took off.) I've also been using Spotify for longer than YouTube Music, or its predecessor that Google killed (as they do periodically) even exited.

BeFlatXIII 1y ago

$10/mo, paid to whom?