4 ms·

Maybe I'm missing it, but they mention Flatbuffers a lot here, then don't show benchmarks: https://fory.apache.org/blog/fury_blazing_fast_multiple_language_ser

Maybe I'm missing it, but they mention Flatbuffers a lot here, then don't show benchmarks: https://fory.apache.org/blog/fury_blazing_fast_multiple_language_serialization_framework/ https://fory.apache.org/blog/fury_blazing_fast_multiple_lang... But flatbuffers is _much_ faster than protobuf/json: https://flatbuffers.dev/benchmarks/ https://flatbuffers.dev/benchmarks/

chaokunyang 1y ago
In our Java benchmarks, Fory is actually faster than FlatBuffers — you can try it yourself here: https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/main/java/benchmark/src/main/java/org/apache/fory/benchmark/state/FlatBuffersState.java https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/main/java/benchmark/src/... We haven’t tested FlatBuffers vs. Fory for Rust yet, but we plan to. It’s also worth noting the focus is a bit different: FlatBuffers is great for certain constrained scenarios (e.g., games, embedded), while Fory is a more general‑purpose serialization framework with features like cross‑language object graph support, circular reference handling, and schema evolution.