Because you present something unproven and opaque against something proven and transparent and you want "them" to provide you with something you can't produce y

Because you present something unproven and opaque against something proven and transparent and you want "them" to provide you with something you can't produce yourself. Every engagement with your initial comment would end in straw men arguments of your side. Even if you believe wikipedia is left-leaning I can still look at the battleground of the discussion behind the article. I don't see a feature like this on grokipedia. Your comment is ragebait aimed at one side of the discussion with rhetoric that's used by the other side. I am glad you only disputed the hateful in my initial comment because your bias is blinding.