3 ms·
> single model that can both write a play and drive a car. It would be a really silly thing to do, and probably there are engineering subletities as to why thi
by torginus 1y ago
> single model that can both write a play and drive a car.
It would be a really silly thing to do, and probably there are engineering subletities as to why this would be a bad idea, but I don't see why you couldn't train a single model to do both.
- tsimionescu 1y agoIt's not silly, it is in fact a clear necessity to have both of these for something to be even close to AGI. And you additionally need it trained on many other tasks - if you believe that each task requires additional parameters and additional training data, then it becomes very clear that we are nowhere near to a general intelligence system; and it should also be pretty clear that this will not scale to 100 tasks with anything similar to the current hardware and training algorithms.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]