1: I understand rent control, and I understand the auto month-to-month. Rent control, and eviction are 2 separate things. And under SF eviction law if the only

1: I understand rent control, and I understand the auto month-to-month. Rent control, and eviction are 2 separate things. And under SF eviction law if the only subtenant in a spot is not approved by the land lord then that subtenant can be evicted; Independent of rent. 2: Subtenants do not assume the lease of the original tenant. A lease is not a license, and can not be transfered in that manor. However subtenants are offered the full power of rent control, and a master tenant can not raise rent. 3: we agree? you must pay rent while being evicted or else you will owe the back rent upon eviction. 4: If your lease specifies then your landlord will recoup whatever legal fees they wish. If the lease doesn't specify then under California law your landlord would be able to get "reasonable" fees. Either way your going to pay something. 5: I think your blog post shows that you are participating int the 5 rules that make up fraud. (1) a false statement of a material fact (2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue (3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim (4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement (5) injury to the alleged victim as a result. 6: WebMD is not giving medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.. You should read there articles more closely. 7: I agree on both counts. 8: Evicting roommates is different that evicting a single tenant; as in California they have master tenants.