4 ms·
It's been mentioned about a dozen times already, you should have read it already. Again: It is the _combination_ of a custom crop and pest/herbicides which has
by Y-bar 1y ago
It's been mentioned about a dozen times already, you should have read it already. Again: It is the _combination_ of a custom crop and pest/herbicides which has a clear tendency to contaminate nearby farms, making the only viable crop the custom crop which has been engineered to withstand that specific treatment.
- pfdietz 1y agoThe contamination issue was also a ridiculous red herring. So, no, you don't have any real argument here. It's all the usual rationalization of irrational GMO hatred.
- Y-bar 1y agoOH MY GOD! Today I learned that I, who generally like GMO, is actually exhibiting "irrational GMO hatred" when I don't even argue against the usage of GMO, but instead argue against the problematic usage of herbicide and pesticide which has externalities which are not properly accounted for and guarded against! You have also convinced me that facts and studies on the subject matters not, and that your, let me count them, zero sources, are better! Do you have any other wisdom to spare from below the bridge?